

S:DISS-X Basic Class 5
After Action Review Study Guide (AAR)
Session Summary
Practical 5 focused on one of the most common helping mistakes: over-helping. Throughout the session, Mike demonstrated how helpers often leave the person’s actual words too quickly and move into teaching, explaining, advising, fixing, or generating solutions before enough understanding has been established.
The practical revisited several themes introduced in earlier classes, particularly the importance of staying with the person’s language. Mike reviewed an exchange involving the statement, “I was making the feeling bigger than the task.” Rather than rushing to explain what this means, he demonstrated how selective inquiry can remain close to the person’s words through simple responses such as “And?” or “So?” These small moves allow the person to continue developing their own understanding without the helper importing additional meaning.
A major theme involved the difference between expansion and contraction. Mike explained that the word “AND” often invites expansion by encouraging the person to add information, while the word “SO” often invites synthesis, integration, or contraction. Neither is automatically better. The helper learns to observe which move creates leverage and which move best fits the person’s current situation.
The session also explored the idea that selective inquiry can be brief, temporary, and highly focused. Helping does not always require a full coaching, advising, teaching, or problem-solving process. Sometimes a helper can enter a conversation, make one leveraged inquiry move, and return to the larger discussion. This reinforces the S:DISS-X principle that inquiry should be selective rather than mechanical.
Another important lesson involved over-helping. During the demonstration, Mike showed how AI systems and human helpers often respond by generating multiple options, explanations, and suggestions before the actual issue has been identified. While this may appear helpful, it frequently shifts attention away from the person’s experience and toward the helper’s capabilities. The result is helping that feels intelligent but lacks fit.
The practical also revisited the distinction between PING and PROBE. Mike explained that introducing a word or concept that has not been tabled by the person usually functions as a PING. By contrast, staying with a word the person has already introduced functions as a PROBE. This distinction reinforces the importance of listening carefully before deciding which form of inquiry best fits the situation.
The session concluded with a discussion about mistakes, ego protection, and learning. Mike noted that growth requires the willingness to admit mistakes, say “I don’t know,” and remain open to correction. Helpers who become overly concerned with appearing correct often limit their own development. Learning requires experimentation, observation, and enough mistakes to generate useful feedback.
Full Demo Exchange
To view – Click here
What Happened
The practical examined how helpers often over-help by leaving the person’s words too quickly.
Mike reviewed examples showing how small inquiry moves such as “And?” and “So?” can create leverage while preserving the person’s ownership of meaning. He contrasted this approach with common helping habits such as explaining, teaching, generating options, and solving problems before the real issue has been identified.
The session also explored expansion versus contraction, PING versus PROBE, and the role of leverage in selective inquiry. Through demonstrations and reflections on AI-generated responses, students observed how quickly helpers can become focused on displaying capability rather than understanding the person’s experience.
The practical concluded with a discussion of learning, mistakes, ego protection, and the importance of remaining open to correction throughout the developmental process.
S:DISS-X Forms Observed
| Form of Inquiry | Where It Appeared | Why It Mattered |
|---|---|---|
| PING | Introducing a new concept not previously tabled | Opened a new area of exploration. |
| PROBE | “And?” and “So?” | Stayed within the person’s existing context. |
| PAUSE | “Good place to pause.” | Protected learning and prevented over-helping. |
| PACE | Keeping examples small and focused | Reduced cognitive load and improved visibility of the move. |
| PROMPT | Inviting continued reflection | Encouraged the person to carry the meaning forward. |
| PERMIT | Allowing incomplete understanding | Reduced pressure for premature conclusions. |
| PERTURB | Challenging teaching and fixing habits | Disrupted common helping mistakes. |
IMULL Score
| IMULL Element | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Importance | High | Over-helping directly affects helping effectiveness. |
| Motivation | Medium-High | Learning and improvement were recurring themes. |
| Urgency | Low | The focus remained on understanding rather than immediate action. |
| Leverage | High | Small inquiry moves produced substantial insight. |
| Low-hanging Fruit | High | Students can immediately apply “And?” and “So?” in conversations. |
Overall IMULL Read
4.7 / 5
Leverage and low-hanging fruit were particularly strong because very small changes in inquiry behavior can significantly improve helping outcomes.
RightACTION Note
The RightACTION in this session was restraint.
Rather than generating solutions, explanations, or teaching points, the helper remained focused on creating space for the person’s own understanding to emerge.
The practical reinforced that helping effectiveness often improves when the helper does less rather than more. A single leveraged inquiry move may create greater developmental value than a lengthy explanation.
RightACTION was not fixing the problem. RightACTION was helping the person see the problem more clearly.
TPOVs Surfaced
Reinforced TPOVs
| TPOV | Short Definition |
|---|---|
| Forms, Not Skills | S:DISS-X consists of seven forms of inquiry. |
| Stay Close to Their Words | Inquiry remains connected to what the person actually said. |
| Less Is More | Small inquiry moves often create larger results. |
| The Form Chooses You | Listening reveals which form best fits the situation. |
| Problem Finding Before Problem Solving | Understanding comes before intervention. |
| IMULL | Importance, Motivation, Urgency, Leverage, Low-hanging Fruit. |
New or Candidate TPOVs
| Candidate TPOV | Short Definition |
|---|---|
| Over-Helping Happens When We Leave the Word Too Soon | Explanations often arrive before understanding. |
| One Shot, Make It Count | Inquiry moves should be selective and leveraged. |
| AND Expands, SO Integrates | Different inquiry moves create different cognitive effects. |
| Capability Can Become a Distraction | Being able to help is not the same as helping effectively. |
| Good Place to Pause | Learning often benefits from stopping before over-helping begins. |
Advanced TPOVs Mentioned
| TPOV | Note |
|---|---|
| Ladder of Inference | Expansion and contraction influence reasoning processes. |
| Developmental Levels | Different rules and capabilities emerge at different levels of complexity. |
| Leverage | High-value inquiry moves produce disproportionate benefit. |
| Ego Position | Identity protection influences learning and helping behavior. |
| Moderator Function | Balancing thinking and feeling improves helping fit. |
Suggestions for Improvement
- Add additional examples using “AND” and “SO.”
- Provide a visual model showing expansion and contraction.
- Include side-by-side examples of helping versus over-helping.
- Create beginner exercises practicing one-word inquiry moves.
- Clarify when a word functions as a PING versus a PROBE.
- Add examples demonstrating selective inquiry in customer-service situations.
- Include more discussion of leverage and inquiry economy.
- Reduce advanced developmental terminology during beginner instruction.
- Continue reinforcing the value of stopping before over-helping occurs.
APC Source Candidate Notes
Candidate Source Title
Over-Helping Happens When We Leave the Word Too Soon
Source Type
S:DISS-X Practice Vignette / Foundational TPOV
Canonical Definition
Over-Helping Happens When We Leave the Word Too Soon is the helping principle that reminds helpers to remain with the person’s actual language long enough for meaning to emerge before moving into explanation, teaching, fixing, advising, or solution generation.
Why It Matters
Many helping failures occur because helpers respond to their own interpretation rather than to the person’s actual experience. Remaining with the person’s words creates better fit, improves accuracy, and increases the likelihood of discovering the real issue. The principle supports selective inquiry, developmental helping, stronger listening, and movement toward RightACTION through leverage rather than over-extension.
Do Not Collapse With
Do not collapse this with passivity, silence, or refusing to contribute. The principle does not prohibit explanation or advice. It simply encourages helpers to earn those moves through understanding rather than delivering them prematurely.

Join us,
Our team at Living & Loving Inquiry
Mike R Jay & Gary Gile
Founders @ The NEW LeadU
Subscribe @ leadu.com/news
PS: For clarification –
- If you just want notice of the LeadU blog posts subscribe @ leadu.blog
- If you want the blog content by email, our weekly newsletter, and breaking news, subscribe @ leadu.com/news.
- Disclaimer

Notice: To pre-order a copy of Mike’s latest book mentioned in some of his posts in e-book format for $9.97 (available late 2026), visit HERE to be first in line.
If you have any comments, questions, suggestions, or need some additional help, please visit https://www.leadu.com/comment/ to submit them. Someone will get back to you within 48 hours.

We hope you pick up valuable insights, ideas, and tools during this process, which you can use for your own development as well as your work and leadership with others.
You, Me, and We @LeadU

Mike R. Jay is a developmentalist utilizing consulting, coaching, advising and helping… emergent from dynamic inquiry as a means to cue, scaffold, support, lift, and protect; offering inspiration to aspiring leaders who are interested in humaning where being, doing, having, becoming, contributing, relating, guiding to produce resilience and wellth help people lead generative lives.
