S:DISS-X Practical 6
After Action Review Study Guide (AAR)
A practical demonstration exploring how selective inquiry, developmental awareness, and humaning help prevent helping from collapsing into pressure, performance, or control.
Session Summary
This sixth S:DISS-X practical session focused on one of the deepest developmental themes introduced so far: helping must remain subordinate to humaning. Mike explored the idea that effective helping cannot be reduced to merely applying methods, techniques, or inquiry forms mechanically. Instead, helping must remain grounded in awareness of the person as an adaptive, developmental, meaning-making system that is constantly “humaning.”
The session began with Mike experimenting live with AI responses around the concept of “humaning,” a term he developed through years of work with Don Beck and the interpretation of developmental systems. Humaning was described as the ongoing process of being, doing, having, and becoming in changing conditions. Mike explained that people do not simply move through fixed linear stages. Instead, human development may function more like a weighted network responding adaptively to culture, conditions, requirements, motives, and complexity.
Throughout the practical, Mike demonstrated how S:DISS-X inquiry can be used not merely to gather information, but to test whether understanding has actually become lived, behavioral, and adaptive. He repeatedly emphasized the difference between “smart talking” and real developmental integration. A person may speak intelligently about a concept while still remaining hollow if the understanding has not translated into activity, reflection, adaptation, or self-awareness.
A major theme of the session involved recognizing the helper as “a person in process,” not merely someone applying a helping method. Mike explained that helpers often become overly attached to usefulness, advice-giving, intervention, or agency. When this happens, helping may become distorted by the helper’s own needs, pressure, urgency, or identity. The result is “helping under the influence,” where the method begins serving the helper instead of the person being helped.
The practical also explored how AI can act as a reflective developmental partner. Mike used live interaction with the AI to test whether responses reflected merely mirrored language or deeper adaptive understanding. He repeatedly checked for signs of pCc — potential, CAPACITY, capability — and looked for indications that the system could not only explain ideas but apply them adaptively across contexts.
Several advanced developmental ideas surfaced throughout the session, including metasystematic thinking, networked development, agency versus communion, adaptive intelligence, VUCA conditions, CCR (Culture, Conditions, Requirements), and human-AI concurrency. Mike connected these ideas back to S:DISS-X by emphasizing that inquiry forms should remain subordinate to humaning rather than becoming controlling methods.
By the end of the session, the central insight became clear: the deepest question in helping is not only “Which inquiry form fits?” but “Is the helper present, adaptive, restrained, and human enough for the helping to truly serve the person being helped?”
Full Demo Exchange
What Happened
The session began with Mike experimenting live with the concept of “humaning” and attempting to test whether the AI could recognize developmental patterns rather than simply generate intelligent-sounding responses. He intentionally disrupted prompts and reflected on how changes in framing altered the system’s responses. This became part of the larger exploration of how systems adapt, mirror, and reveal understanding.
As the interaction unfolded, Mike explained that humaning refers to the dynamic balancing of being, doing, having, and becoming within changing Culture, Conditions, and Requirements (CCR). Rather than viewing development as a fixed spiral or rigid stage sequence, he described development as a networked system of adaptive weighting and motives.
A major turning point occurred when the conversation shifted from methods to the helper’s own developmental process. Mike repeatedly emphasized that helpers themselves remain “people in process.” Inquiry forms may become dangerous when separated from self-awareness, restraint, pacing, and adaptation. Helping can unintentionally become pressure, control, or performance if the helper’s own needs dominate the interaction.
The practical also explored the distinction between mirrored intelligence and lived integration. Mike checked whether responses reflected merely “smart talking” or whether adaptive understanding and self-application were emerging. This connected to pCc, readiness, developmental levels, and the transfer from explanation into embodied adaptive behavior.
The session concluded with reflections on agency versus communion, developmental diversity, adaptive intelligence, and why helping must remain customized to the person being helped. Mike reinforced that “it’s all about them” and that effective helping depends on meeting people where they are developmentally rather than forcing them into the helper’s system.
S:DISS-X Forms Observed
| Form of Inquiry | Where It Appeared | Why It Mattered |
|---|---|---|
| PING | “Do you experience yourself humaning that?” | Tested whether deeper developmental integration was present. |
| PROBE | “Helping stays subordinate to humaning?” | Returned directly to the emerging governing insight. |
| PAUSE | Reflecting on distorted prompts and incomplete understanding | Slowed premature certainty and interpretation. |
| PACE | Gradually increasing developmental complexity | Protected assimilatable learning. |
| PROMPT | Asking for concrete examples of adaptation | Encouraged movement from abstraction into application. |
| PERMIT | Allowing uncertainty and partial understanding | Reduced pressure for immediate conceptual mastery. |
| PERTURB | Challenging method-centered helping | Interrupted assumptions that helping is merely technique application. |
IMULL Score
| IMULL Element | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Importance | High | The session addressed foundational questions about helping and human development. |
| Motivation | High | Sustained exploration showed strong curiosity and developmental engagement. |
| Urgency | Medium-Low | The practical intentionally slowed pacing to preserve reflection and assimilation. |
| Leverage | High | Small inquiry shifts repeatedly uncovered deeper governing dynamics. |
| Low-hanging Fruit | Medium | Core concepts were actionable but developmentally dense. |
4.5 out of 5
Importance and leverage were exceptionally strong. Urgency remained moderated to preserve developmental pacing, reflection, and assimilation.
RightACTION Note
The RightACTION in this practical was not stronger intervention or more technique. The fitting action was preserving human presence, restraint, and adaptive awareness so that helping remained subordinate to humaning.
This mattered because methods alone can become performative, controlling, or disconnected from the actual developmental needs of the person being helped. Mike demonstrated that effective helping requires the helper to remain aware of their own motives, pressure states, assumptions, and adaptive limitations.
The practical also reinforced that developmental helping is deeply contextual. People differ in motives, levels, layers, phases, capability, agency, communion, and readiness. Therefore, helping cannot be standardized mechanically. RightACTION depends on meeting people where they are and responding adaptively rather than rigidly applying technique.
TPOVs Surfaced
Reinforced TPOVs
| TPOV | Short Definition |
|---|---|
| Forms, Not Skills | S:DISS-X consists of seven forms of inquiry from which many skills may emerge. |
| Selective Inquiry | Inquiry forms should be used contextually rather than mechanically. |
| Meeting People Where They Are | Effective helping depends on developmental fit and pCc awareness. |
| Inquiry Before Control | Inquiry should support understanding before intervention. |
| Humaning Matters | Helping must remain grounded in adaptive human development. |
| IMULL | Importance, Motivation, Urgency, Leverage, and Low-hanging fruit guide helping. |
| It’s All About Them | Helping should remain oriented toward the person being helped, not the helper’s needs. |
New or Candidate TPOVs
| Candidate TPOV | Short Definition |
|---|---|
| Helping Must Remain Subordinate to Humaning | Helping methods must serve adaptive human development rather than become controlling systems. |
| Smart Talking vs Lived Integration | Intellectual explanation is different from adaptive developmental embodiment. |
| Humaning as Network | Human development may function as adaptive weighted networks rather than rigid linear stages. |
| Presence Before Performance | Effective helping requires genuine presence rather than performative technique application. |
| Adaptive Helping | Helping must recalibrate continuously with changing CCR and VUCA conditions. |
Advanced TPOVs Mentioned
| TPOV | Note |
|---|---|
| Humaning | Being, doing, having, and becoming as adaptive existential processes. |
| CCR | Culture, Conditions, and Requirements shape developmental adaptation. |
| VUCA | Volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity shape helping conditions. |
| pCc | Potential, CAPACITY, capability were repeatedly checked through inquiry. |
| Human-AI Concurrency | AI may extend adaptive exploration and complexity handling. |
| Metasystematic Thinking | Development includes reflection across systems and contexts. |
| Agency vs Communion | Different motivational orientations shape helping interactions. |
| Network Development | Development may function as weighted adaptive networks rather than fixed stages. |
| Coaching Under the Influence | Helper needs and motives may distort helping processes. |
| Voltage Model | Vertical, oblique, lateral, and time complexity were referenced as developmental dimensions. |
Suggestions for Improvement
- Separate beginner and advanced developmental theory more clearly.
- Define “humaning” earlier with simpler examples before deeper abstraction.
- Reduce the number of conceptual sidebars during live inquiry segments.
- Add visual examples comparing stage models versus network models.
- Provide clearer beginner explanations of agency versus communion.
- Clarify when AI reflection represents mirroring versus adaptive integration.
- Use shorter summaries after highly abstract developmental discussions.
- Add concrete everyday examples of “helping outrunning humaning.”
- Slow down metasystematic explanations for new learners.
APC Source Candidate Notes
Helping Must Remain Subordinate to Humaning is a developmental helping stance in which inquiry methods, interventions, and helping systems remain grounded in adaptive human development, contextual fit, and awareness of the person as an ongoing meaning-making process rather than merely an object of intervention.
This stance protects helping from collapsing into performance, control, interrogatory pressure, or method-centered behavior. It reminds helpers that effective helping depends not only on inquiry technique, but also on human presence, restraint, developmental awareness, pacing, and adaptive responsiveness.
The approach also strengthens contextual fit by emphasizing that people differ in motives, readiness, capability, agency, communion, developmental layers, and environmental conditions. Helping therefore must remain flexible, adaptive, and person-centered rather than mechanically procedural.
Do not collapse this with anti-method thinking, passive relativism, or rejection of structure. Inquiry forms, developmental models, and helping systems remain useful. The point is that methods must remain subordinate to the real developmental needs, readiness, and humanity of the person being helped rather than becoming controlling systems in themselves.
Join us,
Our team at Living & Loving Inquiry
Mike R Jay & Gary Gile
Founders @ The NEW LeadU
Subscribe @ leadu.com/news
PS: For clarification –
- If you just want notice of the LeadU blog posts subscribe @ leadu.blog
- If you want the blog content by email, our weekly newsletter, and breaking news, subscribe @ leadu.com/news.
- Disclaimer
Notice: To pre-order a copy of Mike’s latest book mentioned in some of his posts in e-book format for $9.97 (available late 2026), visit HERE to be first in line.
If you have any comments, questions, suggestions, or need some additional help, please visit https://www.leadu.com/comment/ to submit them. Someone will get back to you within 48 hours.
We hope you pick up valuable insights, ideas, and tools during this process, which you can use for your own development as well as your work and leadership with others.
You, Me, and We @LeadU
Mike R. Jay is a developmentalist utilizing consulting, coaching, advising and helping… emergent from dynamic inquiry as a means to cue, scaffold, support, lift, and protect; offering inspiration to aspiring leaders who are interested in humaning where being, doing, having, becoming, contributing, relating, guiding to produce resilience and wellth help people lead generative lives.
