COACHING AI – BRIEF 3

COACHING AI — BRIEF 3

Jun 23

Banner

COACHING AI — BRIEF 3

When Advice Fails, Posture Matters

← Previous:
COACHING AI 2

Next: →
COACHING AI 4

Segment 1 — How This Brief Works

This Brief begins with a short, scripted orientation.
It is meant to be read slowly and deliberately.

Its purpose is not to teach you how to coach.
It is to help you notice what changes
when advice and fixing stop working.

After this orientation, we’ll open things up.
We’ll use these ideas as anchors
for inquiry, examples, and lived experience.

If thoughts come up while I’m reading,
I may integrate them lightly.
Deeper exploration will come later.

For now, we are orienting posture.


Segment 2 — When Advice Stops Working

Most of us learned to help by giving advice.

Advice feels responsible.
It feels caring.
It feels like showing up.

For a long time, it mostly worked.

But in a world that won’t slow down,
advice quietly loses its footing.

Not because people become careless.
Not because intelligence declines.

But because speed collapses the space
where judgment used to form.

Advice assumes time.
It assumes stable context.
It assumes outcomes can be anticipated.

Those assumptions no longer hold.


Segment 3 — Why More Advice Makes Things Worse

As complexity rises,
the pressure to help increases.

Silence feels cruel.
Hesitation feels irresponsible.

So advice accelerates
right when it becomes least reliable.

Under pressure, advice narrows attention.
It accelerates commitment.
It replaces reflection with action.

And once given, advice is hard to undo.

What looks like help
quietly becomes pressure.


Segment 4 — Fixing Is Not the Same as Helping

When advice stops working,
many people shift into fixing.

Fixing feels decisive.
Fixing feels useful.
Fixing creates motion.

But fixing solves the wrong problem.

Most of the challenges people face today
are not technical.

They are orientational.

Fixing replaces someone else’s judgment
with your own.

And in an unstable world,
borrowed judgment becomes dangerous.


Segment 5 — What Actually Gets Lost

When advice and fixing dominate,
something subtle erodes.

Agency.

Not independence.
Not competence.

Agency as the felt sense:
I am choosing.

When judgment is replaced—
even kindly—
people stop listening to themselves.

They move faster.
They comply sooner.
They feel less certain over time.

Confidence thins.
Dependence grows.


Segment 6 — Coaching Begins with Restraint

Coaching does not begin with questions.
It does not begin with techniques.
It does not begin with better advice.

It begins with restraint.

Restraint from fixing.
Restraint from concluding too quickly.
Restraint from reducing complexity prematurely.

This restraint is not passive.

It is an active choice
to protect judgment
when pressure is high.


Segment 7 — Coaching as Posture, Not Method

Coaching is not a method for producing answers.

It is a posture
that keeps thinking intact
when answers are seductive.

Coaching stays present
without taking over.

It allows discomfort
without abandoning support.

It slows the moment just enough
for orientation to return.


Segment 8 — Why This Is Hard

Most helpers struggle here.

If I don’t fix this, am I doing enough?
If I don’t advise, am I useful?
If I don’t intervene, am I failing?

These questions are honest.

They reflect care.

They also reveal how tightly
helping has been tied to worth.

Coaching asks for a different kind of contribution.


Segment 9 — What This Brief Leaves Open

This Brief does not tell you how to coach.
It does not teach you what to say.
It does not offer steps or models.

It establishes a boundary.

Advice ends here.
Fixing ends here.

What comes next
is not silence—
but a posture capable of holding judgment
when speed, pressure, and uncertainty rise.

That posture deserves careful attention.

And that is where we will turn next.


TPOV Now — Summarized with BDKS

  • Behaviors
  • Design
  • Knowledge, Skills, and Experience
  • System (Meta)

Essentially, there are four basic assumptions that guide the formation of dynamic inquiry. These assumptions originate from Chris Argyris’s 2000 book Flawed Advice and the Management Trap.

Argyris indicated that Actionable, rather than flawed advice, has the following characteristics:

  • Specified Behavior: That which is required to produce the intended consequences or goals.
  • Transparent Causality: know exactly of what causes specific effects.
  • Testable Causality: must be possible in normal situations.
  • Actionable Knowledge: specify the values or governing variables that underline the govern
    the advice or design of the advance.


Four criteria are required to give actionable advice, quoted directly from
Argyris (Flawed Advice and the Management Trap, 2000):

  1. It specifies the detailed, concrete behaviors required to achieve the intended consequences.
  2. It is crafted in the form of designs that contain causal statements.
  3. People must have, or be able to be taught, the concepts and skills required to implement those causal statements.
  4. The context (system) in which it is to be implemented does not prevent its implementation.

fancy line

Join us,
Our team at Living & Loving Inquiry

Mike R Jay & Gary Gile
Founders @ The NEW LeadU

Subscribe @ leadu.ai/news

PS: For clarification –

  1. If you just want notice of the LeadU blog posts subscribe @ leadu.blog
  2. If you want the blog content by email, our weekly newsletter, and breaking news, subscribe @ leadu.ai/news.
  3. Disclaimer

fancy line


Notice:
To pre-order a copy of Mike’s latest book mentioned in some of his posts in e-book format for $9.97 (available late 2025), visit HERE to be first in line.

If you have any comments, questions, suggestions, or need some additional help, please visit https://www.leadu.com/comment/ to submit them. Someone will get back to you within 48 hours.

fancy line

We hope you pick up valuable insights, ideas, and tools during this process, which you can use for your own development as well as your work and leadership with others.

You, Me, and We @LeadU

fancy line

 

mrjMike R. Jay is a developmentalist utilizing consulting, coaching, advising and helping… emergent from dynamic inquiry as a means to cue, scaffold, support, lift, and protect; offering inspiration to aspiring leaders who are interested in humaning where being, doing, having, becoming, contributing, relating, guiding to produce resilience and wellth help people lead generative lives.

 

Leadership University
fancy line