S:DISS-X Basic Class 4
After Action Review Study Guide (AAR)
Session Summary
Practical 4 focused on a subtle but important helping error: interpreting the person’s experience before sufficient understanding has been established. Throughout the session, Mike explored how helpers often hear a word, phrase, or emotional signal and immediately translate it into their own explanation. While this may feel helpful, it frequently causes the helper to move away from the person’s actual experience and toward the helper’s assumptions.
The practical centered on the statement, “I feel behind.” Mike demonstrated how many helpers immediately begin explaining what “behind” means. Some assume the person is overwhelmed. Others assume poor time management, procrastination, stress, lack of motivation, or fear of failure. Each interpretation may sound reasonable, but none are actually present in the original statement. The helper has moved beyond the available evidence and begun creating meaning rather than discovering it.
A major teaching point involved the difference between staying with a word and claiming understanding. Mike emphasized that repeating or probing a person’s language is not a sign of ignorance. It is a disciplined helping practice. Asking “Behind?” allows the person to define what the word means in their own context. By contrast, saying “You feel overwhelmed because you have too much on your plate” inserts an interpretation that may or may not be correct.
The practical also revisited the relationship between inquiry and developmental helping. S:DISS-X is not designed to help the helper sound intelligent. It is designed to help the person discover more accurate understanding. Mike repeatedly reinforced that inquiry should create conditions for learning, not replace the person’s own meaning-making process.
Another theme involved humility. Mike noted that one of the most useful responses available to a helper is “I don’t know.” This does not signal incompetence. Instead, it reflects respect for reality. If the helper does not yet know what a word means in the person’s experience, pretending to know creates distortion. Inquiry allows understanding to emerge naturally. The practical therefore linked good helping with intellectual honesty and accurate observation.
The session also reinforced previous discussions regarding IMULL. Importance, Motivation, Urgency, Leverage, and Low-hanging Fruit cannot be accurately evaluated if the helper misunderstands the actual situation. Before assessing leverage or urgency, the helper must first understand what is actually happening.
The practical concluded by reinforcing a beginner-level S:DISS-X principle: stay with the word before claiming understanding. The helper does not earn credibility by being first to explain. The helper earns credibility by helping the person see more clearly what is already present. Inquiry therefore becomes a tool for protecting accuracy, fit, and developmental growth rather than a method for displaying expertise.
Full Demo Exchange
To view – Click here
What Happened
The practical examined how helpers often confuse interpretation with understanding.
Mike used examples showing that hearing a word does not mean understanding its meaning. A helper may hear “behind,” “stuck,” “frustrated,” or “overwhelmed” and immediately create explanations that were never provided by the person.
The session demonstrated how selective inquiry helps prevent this error. Rather than explaining the person’s experience, the helper remains close to the original language and uses inquiry to explore meaning.
The discussion also reinforced humility, intellectual honesty, developmental helping, and the importance of admitting uncertainty when understanding has not yet been established. Students were encouraged to see inquiry as a way of discovering meaning rather than supplying meaning.
The practical concluded by showing how this principle improves fit, strengthens listening, and supports more accurate movement toward RightACTION.
S:DISS-X Forms Observed
| Form of Inquiry | Where It Appeared | Why It Mattered |
|---|---|---|
| PING | Opening exploration of the issue | Invited discussion without assumptions. |
| PROBE | “Behind?” | Stayed inside the person’s existing language. |
| PAUSE | Resisting interpretation | Protected observation before explanation. |
| PACE | Gradual exploration of meaning | Allowed understanding to emerge naturally. |
| PROMPT | Questions inviting clarification | Encouraged the person to define their own experience. |
| PERMIT | Allowing uncertainty to remain | Reduced pressure for immediate conclusions. |
| PERTURB | Challenging the helper’s assumption of understanding | Disrupted a common helping mistake. |
IMULL Score
| IMULL Element | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Importance | High | Understanding before interpretation is foundational. |
| Motivation | Medium | Motivation was discussed indirectly through helping effectiveness. |
| Urgency | Low | The session emphasized slowing down before acting. |
| Leverage | High | Small inquiry moves significantly improve accuracy. |
| Low-hanging Fruit | High | Students can immediately apply this principle. |
Overall IMULL Read
Leverage and low-hanging fruit were particularly strong because a simple change in listening behavior can immediately improve helping effectiveness.
RightACTION Note
The RightACTION in this session was not explanation.
The RightACTION was inquiry.
By resisting the urge to interpret, the helper creates better conditions for understanding. This allows meaning, importance, leverage, and actionability to emerge from the person’s own experience rather than from the helper’s assumptions.
Sometimes the most fitting action is simply remaining curious long enough for reality to become clearer.
TPOVs Surfaced
Reinforced TPOVs
| TPOV | Short Definition |
|---|---|
| Forms, Not Skills | S:DISS-X consists of seven forms of inquiry. |
| Stay Close to Their Words | Inquiry should remain connected to the person’s language. |
| Problem Finding Before Problem Solving | Understanding comes before intervention. |
| Less Is More | Small inquiry moves often create better outcomes. |
| The Form Chooses You | Listening reveals which form best fits the moment. |
| IMULL | Importance, Motivation, Urgency, Leverage, Low-hanging Fruit. |
New or Candidate TPOVs
| Candidate TPOV | Short Definition |
|---|---|
| Do Not Interpret the Lift | Do not claim understanding before it has been established. |
| Stay With the Word | Explore meaning before explaining it. |
| If You Don’t Know, Say You Don’t Know | Intellectual honesty protects inquiry. |
| Understanding Is Not Hearing | Hearing a word does not mean understanding it. |
| Inquiry Protects Accuracy | Inquiry reduces distortion and projection. |
Advanced TPOVs Mentioned
| TPOV | Note |
|---|---|
| Ladder of Inference | Interpretation often happens before sufficient evidence exists. |
| Developmental Helping | Helping should support the person’s own meaning-making process. |
| pCc | Potential, CAPACITY, and capability influence fit and helping choices. |
| Ready-Willing-Able-Fit | Understanding readiness requires accurate observation. |
| Helping Functions | Inquiry supports cueing, scaffolding, guiding, and supporting. |
Suggestions for Improvement
- Add more examples showing interpretation versus inquiry.
- Create a visual diagram illustrating the Ladder of Inference.
- Include additional demonstrations using different emotional words.
- Provide beginner exercises practicing PROBE responses.
- Show examples of helpful and unhelpful interpretations side by side.
- Clarify the relationship between inquiry and intellectual humility.
- Include more discussion of how IMULL depends upon accurate understanding.
- Reinforce the distinction between hearing and understanding.
- Continue using short demonstrations followed by debrief and analysis.
Canonical Definition: Do Not Interpret the Lift is the helping principle that encourages the helper to remain with the person’s actual language and experience rather than prematurely explaining, diagnosing, or interpreting what has been presented.
Why It Matters
When helpers interpret too quickly, they often replace the person’s reality with their own assumptions. This reduces accuracy, weakens fit, and can lead helping efforts in the wrong direction.
Staying with the person’s words creates better conditions for understanding, selective inquiry, developmental helping, and movement toward RightACTION.
Do Not Collapse With
Do not collapse this with passivity, lack of expertise, or refusal to think. The principle does not prohibit interpretation forever. It simply requires that interpretation be earned through inquiry rather than assumed at the beginning of the conversation.
Join us,
Our team at Living & Loving Inquiry
Mike R Jay & Gary Gile
Founders @ The NEW LeadU
Subscribe @ leadu.com/news
PS: For clarification –
- If you just want notice of the LeadU blog posts subscribe @ leadu.blog
- If you want the blog content by email, our weekly newsletter, and breaking news, subscribe @ leadu.com/news.
- Disclaimer
Notice: To pre-order a copy of Mike’s latest book mentioned in some of his posts in e-book format for $9.97 (available late 2026), visit HERE to be first in line.
If you have any comments, questions, suggestions, or need some additional help, please visit https://www.leadu.com/comment/ to submit them. Someone will get back to you within 48 hours.
We hope you pick up valuable insights, ideas, and tools during this process, which you can use for your own development as well as your work and leadership with others.
You, Me, and We @LeadU
Mike R. Jay is a developmentalist utilizing consulting, coaching, advising and helping… emergent from dynamic inquiry as a means to cue, scaffold, support, lift, and protect; offering inspiration to aspiring leaders who are interested in humaning where being, doing, having, becoming, contributing, relating, guiding to produce resilience and wellth help people lead generative lives.
